Case study
Case Study: Subcontractor HSE Assurance on an Abu Dhabi Infrastructure Package
A 22-subcontractor infrastructure package used prequalification scoring, monthly KPI reviews and evidence-based escalation to halve recordable incidents in one year.
The situation
An Abu Dhabi infrastructure package with 22 subcontractors, several appointed at short notice to recover programme. Two-thirds of the recordable incidents in the first year came from four subcontractors, all of whom had passed prequalification on documentation alone. The client's ADOSH-SF-aligned audit rated subcontractor control as the weakest element of the management system.
What changed
- Prequalification was rescored against evidence rather than statements: named competent persons, in-date third-party certificates, actual incident history, and a site visit to an existing job.
- Every subcontractor received a monthly HSE scorecard with the same five measures: close-out of actions, permit defects, induction and competency currency, plant and lifting certification, and near-miss reporting rate.
- Scores were banded — Acceptable, Watchlist, Escalate — and the band, not the narrative, drove the response.
- Watchlist meant a joint improvement plan with dated actions. Escalate meant no new work fronts released until the plan closed, agreed with commercial before the first escalation so it was enforceable.
- Low near-miss reporting was treated as a red flag rather than good news, and the reporting rate was reviewed alongside the incident rate.
Results over twelve months
| Measure | Year 1 | Year 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Recordable incidents | 17 | 8 |
| Subcontractors in Escalate band at year end | 4 | 0 |
| Average action close-out time | 26 days | 9 days |
| Near-miss reports per 100,000 hours | 11 | 38 |
| Audit finding: subcontractor control | Weakest element | Conformant |
What made it work
- The consequence was commercial and agreed in advance. Scorecards without a released-work-front consequence change nothing.
- The same five measures every month meant subcontractors could self-manage rather than guess.
- Evidence-based prequalification caught two subcontractors before award who would otherwise have arrived on site.
- Rising near-miss reporting was celebrated publicly, which is what moved the reporting culture.
The package finished with no lost-time injuries in the final eight months. The team's own conclusion was that nothing in the approach was novel — it was applied to every subcontractor, every month, without exception.
Recommended next reads
- ADOSH-SF and ISO 45001 Evidence Crosswalk for ContractorsWhere the Abu Dhabi ADOSH-SF (formerly OSHAD) framework and ISO 45001 ask for the same evidence, where they diverge, and how contractors maintain one evidence set for both. Scope and limitations stated.Read guide
- Working at Height and Scaffolding: ADOSH-SF V4.1 Evidence Checklist for Abu Dhabi ContractorsThe records, inspections, competence evidence and photographs an Abu Dhabi contractor should retain for working at height and scaffolding under the ADOSH-SF (formerly OSHAD) V4.1 code updates — with the official source to verify against.Read guide
- Crane Subcontractor Handover & Authority Approval: The Dubai and Abu Dhabi Gate SequenceTen approval and certification gates from plot screening to operational release — the two authority branches, the erection hold point, independent third-party certification, and the notification rules that reopen every gate.Read guide
UAE HSE Legal Guide 2026
The consolidated PDF: federal and emirate-level HSE obligations, authority responsibilities and the evidence each inspection expects. Sent to your inbox.
Browse everything in the UAE HSE Compliance Hub.
See it in action
Site Safety UAE is a software-only platform. Watch the recorded demo to see the modules covering your project scope and authority mix.
Watch the demo